Security Stack Logo
Squalify logo

Governance, Risk & Compliance

Squalify

Top-down cyber risk quantification on Munich Re loss data for board-level financial decisions.

Squalify Overview

What it does

Squalify is a top-down cyber risk quantification (CRQ) platform that expresses an organization's cyber exposure in financial terms to guide board and executive decisions. Rather than modeling the likelihood of individual system compromises from the bottom up, it starts from how the business creates value and quantifies what is financially at stake across core loss scenarios. The platform is built on Munich Re's cyber risk model, giving boards defensible monetary figures instead of technical maturity scores.

How it works

The platform runs Monte Carlo simulations over Munich Re's loss dataset to model both the frequency and financial severity of cyber events, producing a Value at Risk figure and average loss estimates for the board. Customers provide fewer than 200 data points describing their business, scenarios, and information-security maturity, which is mapped to NIST or a framework of choice across 100+ controls. Squalify models four scenario types (business interruption, data privacy breach, theft and fraud, and ransomware) and outputs executive reports, budget-approval reports with return-on-security-investment, and subsidiary steering dashboards.

Credentials and traction

The platform is built on the cyber risk model of Munich Re, one of the world's largest cyber reinsurers, refined across more than 4,500 company risk assessments and used to price billions in cyber policies. Named customers include MTU Aero Engines, Jungheinrich, and US digital-health provider Henry Meds. Squalify targets boards, CISOs, and CFOs at large multinational enterprises managing cyber risk across multiple subsidiaries and regulatory regimes such as DORA and NIS2.

Key Capabilities

mapped to solution categories
Cyber-Risk Quantification (CRQ)

Defines and models specific cyber threat scenarios such as ransomware, data breach, business email compromise, or cloud outage as the unit of quantification, tying each scenario to a business decision rather than an enterprise-wide average. Scenario library breadth and support for custom scenario authoring vary across products.

Models the financial loss drivers that set the magnitude of each scenario, including incident response, business interruption, data recovery, regulatory fines, legal liability, and reputational harm. Coverage of secondary and long-tail losses varies across products.

Quantifies exposure to inform insurance coverage adequacy, policy limits, and risk-transfer decisions, and to justify control effectiveness during underwriting and renewal. Dedicated insurance modules are a differentiator rather than a universal capability.

Ranks and optimizes prospective security investments by financial risk reduction per unit of spend, supporting capital allocation, risk acceptance, and control-optimization decisions. Prescriptive optimization is stronger in some products than others.

Quantifies how the organization's existing security controls reduce financial exposure, expressing the monetary value of controls in place and the residual risk they leave. Products vary in whether control effectiveness is derived from observed data or from maturity self-assessment.

Runs Monte Carlo or equivalent simulation to express exposure as probability distributions and ranges, such as annualized loss exposure and loss-exceedance curves, rather than a single-point figure. Some products report only point estimates.

Translates quantified exposure into board-ready, CFO-ready, and executive-ready reporting in financial terms, supporting capital trade-offs, oversight, and budgeting and strategic-planning cycles. Reporting depth and boardroom framing vary across products.

Estimates how likely or how often each modeled scenario is to occur, drawing on threat intelligence, historical incident data, or actuarial loss datasets to ground the likelihood side of the calculation. Products differ in whether frequency is threat-intelligence-driven, actuarial, or expert-estimated.

Expresses the monetary impact of material cyber events for regulatory and disclosure obligations, such as SEC cyber disclosure and materiality assessment. Dedicated disclosure workflows are present in some products and absent in others.

Compliance

certifications
GDPR

Implementation & support

Deployment model
SaaS
Support channels
Email Support

Info last updated on September 2, 2026

Buyers

See how Squalify fits your stack

Add Squalify to your shortlist and unlock all evaluation tools.

Vendors

Is this your product?

Claim your profile to connect with the teams looking for your solutions.

Security Stack Logo

The curated research platform for enterprise cybersecurity solutions.

Resources

All product and company names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners and are used on this website for identification purposes only. Security Stack does not endorse any vendor, product, or service listed, and makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of this content, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

© 2026 Security Stack. All rights reserved.