
AI SecurityGovernance, Risk & Compliance
Enkrypt AI
Red-teams LLM and agent applications, then enforces the findings as runtime guardrails.
Enkrypt AI Overview
What it does
Enkrypt AI is an AI security and compliance platform for large language model (LLM) and agentic applications, pairing offensive testing with runtime enforcement in one closed loop rather than selling either half alone. Its distinguishing mechanism is promotion: failure modes surfaced by Agent Red Teaming are converted into Agent Guardrails policies enforced in production, while the Agent Policy Engine ingests governance documents and regulation PDFs and atomizes them into controls that trace back to the originating clause.
How it works
Six modules cover the pipeline. Agent Red Teaming generates use-case-specific attacks across text, image, and audio against agents, retrieval-augmented generation systems, and tool chains, returning a findings register with reproduction steps and a regression suite that runs as a CI release gate. Agent Guardrails enforces at four boundaries, prompt, retrieval, tool, and output, through detectors covering prompt injection, personally identifiable information, toxicity, answer adherence, system-prompt leak, and copyright leak. MCP Scanner inventories Model Context Protocol servers and tools; the open-source MCP Gateway proxies their traffic inline. Every decision carries a policy ID, reason code, and trace ID.
Credentials and traction
SOC 2 Type II certified. Named a Gartner Cool Vendor in AI Security in 2025, an AI Infrastructure winner at Accenture Ventures in 2025, a 2025 Cyber Defense Magazine winner for Best Solution in AI Security and Compliance, and a 2025 Cyber Security Excellence Award winner. Case studies cover safety alignment for the AI21 Labs Jamba model family and the NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence; Skyhigh Security embeds its generative AI risk capabilities in a cloud access security broker.
Key Capabilities
mapped to solution categoriesAutonomously plans and executes multi-step adversarial campaigns against AI systems, emulating real attacker workflows across reconnaissance, exploitation, and escalation rather than running a fixed checklist of tests.
Attacks AI agents through their tools, memory, and connected services using multi-step techniques such as tool misuse, goal hijacking, and indirect injection, surfacing exploit paths unique to autonomous agents.
Tests LLMs and AI applications against a library of direct and indirect prompt-injection and jailbreak techniques, reporting which payloads bypass system instructions and safety controls.
Generates adversarial inputs across text, image, and audio modalities to test model evasion and misclassification, extending red teaming beyond text-only prompt attacks.
Re-runs red-team campaigns continuously and at release gates in the CI/CD pipeline as models, prompts, and configurations change, catching new exploit paths before and after deployment.
Tests AI agents and their tool chains for context-poisoning, tool-misuse and indirect prompt-injection vulnerabilities.
Reports validated AI vulnerabilities with reproduction evidence, attacker context, and remediation guidance, mapped to the OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, EU AI Act, and NIST AI RMF for auditable AI risk reporting.
Attacks deployed guardrails, system prompts, and content filters to measure how reliably they block adversarial inputs, quantifying bypass rates rather than assuming the controls work.
Detects and blocks adversarial inputs designed to override system prompts, extract training data, or redirect model behavior. Detection approaches include pattern matching, input semantic analysis, and secondary model classification.
Evaluates model outputs against content policy, data classification rules, and format expectations before delivery to end users, blocking responses containing sensitive data or policy violations.
Intercepts prompts and completions to prevent sensitive data (PII, credentials, internal IP), from being transmitted to external LLM services or returned in model responses.
Records prompts, completions, and metadata for all AI interactions with tamper-resistant storage, supporting compliance, forensics, and policy investigation.
Enforces IAM-style policies on LLM API access, controlling which users and applications can invoke which models and data sources, with audit logging.
Discovers, governs and allowlists the Model Context Protocol servers and tools that AI agents are permitted to invoke.
Secures AI coding assistants and their Model Context Protocol connections against unsafe actions, data exposure and supply-chain risks.
Monitors model outputs for factual inconsistency and hallucination, relevant for AI applications where response accuracy has legal, financial, or safety implications.
Continuously stress-tests the product's own guardrails and filters against jailbreaks, prompt-injection payloads, and data-extraction attempts, then re-tightens policies after model or prompt changes. A self-validation loop within the runtime protection layer, distinct from the standalone AI Red Teaming discipline that tests AI systems end to end.
Enforces document-level access at retrieval time so a user receives only context they are authorized to see, filtering before the vector search, after retrieval, or both.
Detects sensitive or regulated data in AI training, fine-tuning, or third-party LLM flows without appropriate controls, such as unencrypted PII in inputs or PHI sent to external APIs.
Maps data lineage and provenance across AI training and inference pipelines, tracing how PII, PHI, and IP move into models and external services.
Monitors AI-agent behavior at runtime to detect anomalous or malicious actions and policy violations.
Assesses the identities and service accounts that AI models, pipelines, and agents use, flagging over-permissioned non-human identities and access paths that violate least privilege. Reports identity risk as a posture finding, distinct from enforcing access policies at the model API at runtime.
Automatically discovers AI models, LLM API connections, ML pipelines, and AI-enabled SaaS applications in use across the organization, including those deployed without IT authorization.
Discovers AI model and inference endpoints and flags public exposure, weak authentication, default credentials, or excessive permissions as posture misconfigurations.
Compliance
certificationsIntegrations
compatible toolsImplementation & support
Info last updated on July 26, 2026
Vendors
Is this your product?
Claim your profile to connect with the teams looking for your solutions.